எதிர்பார்த்தது போலவே அரசு ஊழியர்கள் சம்பளம் அவர்களே எதிர்பார்க்காத அளவுக்கு உயர்த்தப்பட்டுள்ளது...
ஒரு சத்துணவு ஊழியரின் சம்பளம் அரசு மருத்துவமனையில் ஐந்து ஆண்டு காலம் சிறப்பாகப் படித்து பயிற்சி மருத்துவராக இருப்பவரின் சம்பளத்தைக் காட்டிலும் ஏறத்தாழ இரண்டு மடங்காக இருக்கலாம்.....
அரசு மருத்துவர்கள் தேர்தல் பணிக்கா செல்லப் போகிறார்கள்...
பின் அவர்களுக்கு எதற்கு சம்பள உயர்வெல்லாம்......?
சரி... சந்தோசப்படுவோம்....
ஆனால் இனிமேலாவது இந்த வருவாய் அலுவலகம், வணிகவரி அலுவலகம், காவல்துறை இவற்றில் பணிபுரிவோர் கை நீட்டாமல் இருப்பார்களா...?
இல்லை …. இந்த சம்பள உயர்வு போதாதென்று இன்னும் லஞ்சம் கேட்பார்களா...
ஆண்டவனுக்கே ( ஆள்பவர்க்கே) வெளிச்சம்...
Apache Friends is a non-profit project to promote the Apache web server. It was founded in the spring of 2002 by Kai 'Oswald' Seidler and Kay Vogelgesang. The following activities are our contribution towards promoting the web server and related technologies:
1. Easy to use software (see our Apache distribution XAMPP below).
2. Easy to read documentation (Sorry, all texts apart from the FAQ are only available in German, our »Apache für Dummies« book for example).
3. The creation of an online community for helping each other out should any questions or problems arise (see our Forums or Chats for further resources).
Link : http://www.apachefriends.org/en/index.html
1.குழந்தை பிறந்ததும் கூடுமானவரை பார்முலா மில்க் கொடுப்பதை விட தாய் பாலே சிறந்தது.
2. பால் அதிகமாக சுரக்க - ஹார்லிக்ஸ் ,ராகி, ஓட்ஸை பாலில் காய்ச்சி குடிக்கவும்.
ஒரு நாளைக்கு ஐந்து டம்ளர் குடிக்கலாம். ஓவ்வொரு முறை பாலுட்டும் போதும் தாய்மார்கள் சூடாக மேலே குறிப்பிட்ட ஏதாவது ஒரு பானத்தை குடித்து கொண்டு பாலுட்டுவது நல்லது.
3.குழந்தைக்கு சளி இருப்பது போல் தோன்றினால் இஞ்சி காபி குடிக்கலாம்.குளுமையான அயிட்டங்கள் சாப்பிட கூடாது,மிளகு சேர்த்த உணவு சாப்பிட்டால் குழந்தைக்கு சளி பிடிக்காது
4.குழந்தை பெற்றதும் உடலில் உள்ள அனைத்து நரம்புகளும் லேசாகி இளகிய நிலையில் இருக்கும், உடம்பில் காற்று போய்விடும், அதுக்கு தான் அந்த காலத்து பாட்டி மார்கள் பச்ச உடம்பு காரி என்கிறார்கள்.
5.உடம்பில் காற்று போகாமல் இருக்க, தாய்மார்கள் இரண்டு காதுகளையும் ஒரு ஸ்கார்ஃப் கொண்டு சுற்றி கொள்ளவும்.
காலில் என்னேரமும் செருப்பு அனியவும்.
இரவில் தூங்கும் போது சாக்ஸ் போட்டு கொள்ளவும்.
இப்படி செய்வதால் நரம்புகளில் காத்து ஏறுவதை தவிர்க்கலாம்.
6.எலும்புகள் வலுவடைய சிக்கன், மட்டன்,ஆட்டு கால், மீன் போன்றவைகளில் மிளகு சேர்த்து எலும்புகளில் சூப் வைத்து 40 நாட்கள் வரை முன்று டம்ளர் அளவிற்கு குடித்தால், உங்கள் எலும்பும் பலம் பெறும், உங்கள் குழந்தை எலும்பும் பலம் பெறும்.பாலும் நல்ல சுரக்கும்.
7. பிள்ளை பெற்றவர்களுக்கு வயிறும் பத்து மாதமாக பெரியதாக இருந்ததால் சுருங்க நாள் எடுக்கும். நார்மல் டெலிவரி ஆனவர்கள் இடுப்பை சுற்றி ஒரு ஜான் அளவிற்கு பெல்ட் போடவும், இல்லை மெல்லிய காட்டன் சேலையை மேல்வயிறுக்கும், அடிவயிற்றிக்கும் சுருட்டி இருக்கமாக கட்டி கொள்ளவும். சாப்பிடும் நேரம்,பாத்ரூம் போகும் நேரம் தவிர மற்ற நேரம் கண்டிப்பாக கட்டவும்.இது தொடர்ந்து 40 நாள் வரை அதற்கு மேல் கொண்டும் கட்டாலாம்.
(இது சுருக்கம் விழாமல் இருக்க பிள்ளை உண்டாகி முன்றாம் மாதத்திலிருந்து வயிறு விரிவு கொடுக்கும் போது அரிப்பெடுத்தால் சொரியாமல் ஏதாவது கிரீம் (அ) ஆலிவ் ஆயில் தடவி வந்தால் பிரசவத்திற்கு பிறகு சுருக்கம் அவ்வள்வாக விழாது.
A
நேபாளத்தில் மீண்டும் மன்னராட்சியைக் கொண்டு வர நடக்கும் சதியின் பின்னணியில் இந்தியா உள்ளது என்று மாவோயிஸ்ட் தலைவரும், அண்மையில் நேபாள பிரதமர் பதவியில் இருந்து விலகியவருமான பிரசண்டா குற்றம்சாட்டியுள்ளார். நேபாளத்தில் 240 ஆண்டு காலமாக இருந்து வந்த மன்னராட்சி 2008 மே 29இல் முடிவுக்கு வந்தது. அதன் பின் நடைபெற்ற தேர்தலில் பிரசண்டா பிரதமரானார். அவர் தொடர்ந்து இந்தியாவுக்கு எதிராகவும், சீனாவுக்கு ஆதரவாகவும் பேசி வந்தார். இந்நிலையில் இராணுவ தலைமைத் தளபதி பதவி நீக்கம் தொடர்பாக அந்நாட்டு அதிபர் ராம் பரன் [...]
EU parliament with no decision-making authority when it comes to war or peace
Documented: Press release of the Federal Committee Peace counsel to the forthcoming European elections
On 7 June 2009 found the European Parliament elections take place. For this reason, the peace movement with an election call has gone out in public. It is not a party to the election, but the election of MPs called for the militarization of the EU to resist. We document the press release and the election call in the hereafter in the text.
Yes to Europe - No to Lisbon Treaty
Press release of the Federal Committee Peace counsel at the forthcoming European elections
Kassel, 1 June 2009 - At the upcoming European Parliament elections task of the Federal Peace Committee issued a statement advice, aimed at the peace movement and the public at large. It is called, only parties or candidates to choose who goes against the "militarization" of the European Union.
The electoral appeal of the "peace advice" is entitled "Yes to Europe - No to Lisbon Treaty". The peace movement was always an internationalist movement, against nationalism and chauvinism, and for the solidarity of the peoples and the cooperation of the states have had. So would the quest for a united and democratic Europe that is in the interior and exterior peace holds, the agreement of the peace movement. For the same reason, but should the Lisbon Treaty strictly rejected.
In the declaration of Kassel is a number of reasons. How does the Lisbon Treaty is a binding commitment for the upgrading of EU Member States (Art. 28 c). At the same time, a "defense agency" responsible for arms production and procurement as well as the European arms trade more effective, which is also on a further upgrade of the Union runs. The EU is increasingly becoming a military union expanded. Today they have over forces in the amount of 80,000 soldiers, and until next year, 13-14 battle groups, each 1,500 men strong, worldwide use to be ready to battle.
Especially critical will be the election call that the European Parliament, specifically in matters of foreign and security policy, if it is literally "to war or peace" is no decision-making competence. And the European Court could (under Article 240) in this field Politi not be.
"Neither Europe nor the world need a new military union," says the paper of the Federal Committee Peace counsel, who concluded "only for a civilian-oriented foreign policy" of the EU decides.
For the Federal Committee Peace Tip:
Peter Strutynski (Speaker)
Annex
Yes to Europe - No to Lisbon Treaty
Federal Committee Peace Tip: call for election of the EU Parliament
Kassel, 29 May 2009 - On the forthcoming elections to the European Parliament, the Speaker of the Federal Committee Peace counsel in Kassel a statement. It is clear that the rejection of the Lisbon Treaty peace politically necessary, but that this was not synonymous with a move away from the European Union.
The peace movement was always an internationalist movement, against nationalism and chauvinism, and for the solidarity of the peoples and the cooperation of states on the basis of equal sovereignty has occurred - as the UN Charter (Art. 2) and international law require. The quest for a united and democratic Europe that is in the interior and exterior peace holds, the agreement of the peace movement, even if this goal with the current European Union of 27 is reached no.
Our "Yes to Europe" but not the recognition of principles and rules that the precept of international law, peace and the general desire for disarmament to the contrary. So let's say in particular "no" to the EU Reform Treaty of Lisbon, for several reasons:
1: After the controversial EU Constitution Treaty of 2004 in two referendums (France and the Netherlands, 2005) was rejected, would have complied with democratic practices, if the entire draft was withdrawn, and on a European constitutional charter fundamentally new thinking would have been. The governments of the EU Shear but not the vote of the population, but, two years after the failure of the EU Constitution a "Reform Treaty", which according to the Irish prime minister to 90 percent identical with the old document. Vertigo label this population may not go to the glue.
2: The EU Reform Treaty obliges the EU Member States to upgrade. C In Article 28 states this unequivocally: "Member States commit themselves to their military capabilities to improve gradually." In the European Security Strategy of 2003 is executed in addition that also the increase in military spending was necessary. Already today the EU over 200 billion for defense and military. A huge waste of taxpayers' money, for the better about spending in the social field or in education are urgently needed.
3: It is an "agency in the field of defense capabilities development, research, acquisition and armaments (European Defense Agency) set up (Art. 28 a) - ie Defense research and arms production, procurement and arms exports to Europe-wide coordinated. These "defense agency" is already working since 2004 and is replaced by the Reform Treaty is the legal legitimacy. The armed forces of the EU countries are among the best-equipped high-tech armies in the world. Not another upgrade and construction of new weapons, but disarmament is the commandment of the hour.
4: It is also worrying that the willingness of EU countries to worldwide military operations also contract is written. EU forces are to "combat missions in crisis management including peace-making" can be used. Next it says in Article 28 b: "All these tasks can be used to combat terrorism are contributing, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territory." The summon a fugitive terrorist threat in Europe is also a pervasive global formula for justifying military interventions made. With the option of a territorial defense, the defense decided on a lower level would include, these provisions have nothing to do. It is solely for military intervention - without geographical limitations.
5: The Reform Treaty of Lisbon provides for the formation of a so-called "core Europe", namely via the "permanent structured cooperation" in the military field. In Article 28 a states: "Member States, the more demanding criteria in terms of military capabilities and meet with a view to the most demanding among broader missions shall establish permanent structured cooperation within the Union." This is possible, even at European level, "coalitions of the willing" to forge. At the same time with this scheme the unanimity procedure in the foreign and security policy, virtually abandoned, as only the participating countries must reach unanimity. (See Article 28 e)
6: Without any decision-making power remains the European Parliament, when it comes to the common foreign and security policy, and therefore also about war and peace. The EUParlament by the High Representative is to "key aspects" regularly informed and consulted. " A right to information but is no right decision. The absence of legal control of the EU Parliament violates principles of separation of powers and parliamentary democracy. Incidentally, also the approval of the Federal Government in the Council not to a Bundestag decision bound, but only after the decision sought. This national parliament investments generally questioned.
7: A big egg is also Article 240 of the Reform Treaty: "The Court of Justice of the European Union is not responsible for the provisions concerning the common foreign and security policy and on the basis of these provisions of Acts." Thus, contrary to the whole of the Militarisierungsteil elementary principles of democratic governance: neither has the European Parliament the possibility of military action nor reject their premises and consequences should be checked. Moreover, the basic principles of separation of powers in this field from the outset set aside because the judiciary neither the contract nor the conformity with international law can verify.
Neither Europe nor the world needs a new military union. Nothing else but with the Lisbon reform treaty contractually fixed. And the treaty - the first to come into force when all EU member states have ratified it - the practice hurries ahead. Since 2000, European troops (with a total strength of 80,000 soldiers) and since 2004, called Battle Groups ( "battle groups") under construction. The planned 13-14 battle groups, each 1,500 men strong, to be, it shall submit the Lisbon Treaty, at the latest by 2010 and 5-10 days across the globe up and running. Germany will focus on five battle groups involved - more than any other EU country.
Even if the EU parliament in matters of foreign and security policy has nothing to decide: The peace movement has an interest in ensuring that the votes in Parliament to be strengthened, which opposes the militarization of the EU and also for a foreign policy based exclusively civil occur.
Federal Committee Peace Tip
29. May 2009
http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb5/frieden/themen/Europa/eu-wahl2009-baf.html
Documented: Press release of the Federal Committee Peace counsel to the forthcoming European elections
On 7 June 2009 found the European Parliament elections take place. For this reason, the peace movement with an election call has gone out in public. It is not a party to the election, but the election of MPs called for the militarization of the EU to resist. We document the press release and the election call in the hereafter in the text.
Yes to Europe - No to Lisbon Treaty
Press release of the Federal Committee Peace counsel at the forthcoming European elections
Kassel, 1 June 2009 - At the upcoming European Parliament elections task of the Federal Peace Committee issued a statement advice, aimed at the peace movement and the public at large. It is called, only parties or candidates to choose who goes against the "militarization" of the European Union.
The electoral appeal of the "peace advice" is entitled "Yes to Europe - No to Lisbon Treaty". The peace movement was always an internationalist movement, against nationalism and chauvinism, and for the solidarity of the peoples and the cooperation of the states have had. So would the quest for a united and democratic Europe that is in the interior and exterior peace holds, the agreement of the peace movement. For the same reason, but should the Lisbon Treaty strictly rejected.
In the declaration of Kassel is a number of reasons. How does the Lisbon Treaty is a binding commitment for the upgrading of EU Member States (Art. 28 c). At the same time, a "defense agency" responsible for arms production and procurement as well as the European arms trade more effective, which is also on a further upgrade of the Union runs. The EU is increasingly becoming a military union expanded. Today they have over forces in the amount of 80,000 soldiers, and until next year, 13-14 battle groups, each 1,500 men strong, worldwide use to be ready to battle.
Especially critical will be the election call that the European Parliament, specifically in matters of foreign and security policy, if it is literally "to war or peace" is no decision-making competence. And the European Court could (under Article 240) in this field Politi not be.
"Neither Europe nor the world need a new military union," says the paper of the Federal Committee Peace counsel, who concluded "only for a civilian-oriented foreign policy" of the EU decides.
For the Federal Committee Peace Tip:
Peter Strutynski (Speaker)
Annex
Yes to Europe - No to Lisbon Treaty
Federal Committee Peace Tip: call for election of the EU Parliament
Kassel, 29 May 2009 - On the forthcoming elections to the European Parliament, the Speaker of the Federal Committee Peace counsel in Kassel a statement. It is clear that the rejection of the Lisbon Treaty peace politically necessary, but that this was not synonymous with a move away from the European Union.
The peace movement was always an internationalist movement, against nationalism and chauvinism, and for the solidarity of the peoples and the cooperation of states on the basis of equal sovereignty has occurred - as the UN Charter (Art. 2) and international law require. The quest for a united and democratic Europe that is in the interior and exterior peace holds, the agreement of the peace movement, even if this goal with the current European Union of 27 is reached no.
Our "Yes to Europe" but not the recognition of principles and rules that the precept of international law, peace and the general desire for disarmament to the contrary. So let's say in particular "no" to the EU Reform Treaty of Lisbon, for several reasons:
1: After the controversial EU Constitution Treaty of 2004 in two referendums (France and the Netherlands, 2005) was rejected, would have complied with democratic practices, if the entire draft was withdrawn, and on a European constitutional charter fundamentally new thinking would have been. The governments of the EU Shear but not the vote of the population, but, two years after the failure of the EU Constitution a "Reform Treaty", which according to the Irish prime minister to 90 percent identical with the old document. Vertigo label this population may not go to the glue.
2: The EU Reform Treaty obliges the EU Member States to upgrade. C In Article 28 states this unequivocally: "Member States commit themselves to their military capabilities to improve gradually." In the European Security Strategy of 2003 is executed in addition that also the increase in military spending was necessary. Already today the EU over 200 billion for defense and military. A huge waste of taxpayers' money, for the better about spending in the social field or in education are urgently needed.
3: It is an "agency in the field of defense capabilities development, research, acquisition and armaments (European Defense Agency) set up (Art. 28 a) - ie Defense research and arms production, procurement and arms exports to Europe-wide coordinated. These "defense agency" is already working since 2004 and is replaced by the Reform Treaty is the legal legitimacy. The armed forces of the EU countries are among the best-equipped high-tech armies in the world. Not another upgrade and construction of new weapons, but disarmament is the commandment of the hour.
4: It is also worrying that the willingness of EU countries to worldwide military operations also contract is written. EU forces are to "combat missions in crisis management including peace-making" can be used. Next it says in Article 28 b: "All these tasks can be used to combat terrorism are contributing, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territory." The summon a fugitive terrorist threat in Europe is also a pervasive global formula for justifying military interventions made. With the option of a territorial defense, the defense decided on a lower level would include, these provisions have nothing to do. It is solely for military intervention - without geographical limitations.
5: The Reform Treaty of Lisbon provides for the formation of a so-called "core Europe", namely via the "permanent structured cooperation" in the military field. In Article 28 a states: "Member States, the more demanding criteria in terms of military capabilities and meet with a view to the most demanding among broader missions shall establish permanent structured cooperation within the Union." This is possible, even at European level, "coalitions of the willing" to forge. At the same time with this scheme the unanimity procedure in the foreign and security policy, virtually abandoned, as only the participating countries must reach unanimity. (See Article 28 e)
6: Without any decision-making power remains the European Parliament, when it comes to the common foreign and security policy, and therefore also about war and peace. The EUParlament by the High Representative is to "key aspects" regularly informed and consulted. " A right to information but is no right decision. The absence of legal control of the EU Parliament violates principles of separation of powers and parliamentary democracy. Incidentally, also the approval of the Federal Government in the Council not to a Bundestag decision bound, but only after the decision sought. This national parliament investments generally questioned.
7: A big egg is also Article 240 of the Reform Treaty: "The Court of Justice of the European Union is not responsible for the provisions concerning the common foreign and security policy and on the basis of these provisions of Acts." Thus, contrary to the whole of the Militarisierungsteil elementary principles of democratic governance: neither has the European Parliament the possibility of military action nor reject their premises and consequences should be checked. Moreover, the basic principles of separation of powers in this field from the outset set aside because the judiciary neither the contract nor the conformity with international law can verify.
Neither Europe nor the world needs a new military union. Nothing else but with the Lisbon reform treaty contractually fixed. And the treaty - the first to come into force when all EU member states have ratified it - the practice hurries ahead. Since 2000, European troops (with a total strength of 80,000 soldiers) and since 2004, called Battle Groups ( "battle groups") under construction. The planned 13-14 battle groups, each 1,500 men strong, to be, it shall submit the Lisbon Treaty, at the latest by 2010 and 5-10 days across the globe up and running. Germany will focus on five battle groups involved - more than any other EU country.
Even if the EU parliament in matters of foreign and security policy has nothing to decide: The peace movement has an interest in ensuring that the votes in Parliament to be strengthened, which opposes the militarization of the EU and also for a foreign policy based exclusively civil occur.
Federal Committee Peace Tip
29. May 2009
http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb5/frieden/themen/Europa/eu-wahl2009-baf.html
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக